Home AI Companies News Anthropic DeepSeek open source DeepEP – library for MoE training and Inference

DeepSeek open source DeepEP – library for MoE training and Inference

0
DeepSeek open source DeepEP – library for MoE training and Inference

Deepep

DeepEP is a communication library tailored for Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) and expert parallelism (EP). It provides high-throughput and low-latency all-to-all GPU kernels, which are also as known as MoE dispatch and combine. The library also supports low-precision operations, including FP8.

To align with the group-limited gating algorithm proposed in the DeepSeek-V3 paper, DeepEP offers a set of kernels optimized for asymmetric-domain bandwidth forwarding, such as forwarding data from NVLink domain to RDMA domain. These kernels deliver high throughput, making them suitable for both training and inference prefilling tasks. Additionally, they support SM (Streaming Multiprocessors) number control.

For latency-sensitive inference decoding, DeepEP includes a set of low-latency kernels with pure RDMA to minimize delays. The library also introduces a hook-based communication-computation overlapping method that does not occupy any SM resource.

Notice: the implementation in this library may have some slight differences from the DeepSeek-V3 paper.

Performance

Normal kernels with NVLink and RDMA forwarding

We test normal kernels on H800 (~160 GB/s NVLink maximum bandwidth), with each connected to a CX7 InfiniBand 400 Gb/s RDMA network card (~50 GB/s maximum bandwidth). And we follow the DeepSeek-V3/R1 pretraining setting (4096 tokens per batch, 7168 hidden, top-4 groups, top-8 experts, FP8 dispatching and BF16 combining).

Type Dispatch #EP Bottleneck bandwidth Combine #EP Bottleneck bandwidth
Intranode 8 153 GB/S (Nvlink) 8 158 GB/S (Nvlink)
Internode 16 43 GB/s (RDMA) 16 43 GB/s (RDMA)
Internode 32 44 GB/s (RDMA) 32 47 GB/s (RDMA)
Internode 64 46 GB/s (RDMA) 64 45 GB/s (RDMA)

Low-latency kernels with pure RDMA

We test low-latency kernels on H800 with each connected to a CX7 InfiniBand 400 Gb/s RDMA network card (~50 GB/s maximum bandwidth). And we follow a typical DeepSeek-V3/R1 production setting (128 tokens per batch, 7168 hidden, top-8 experts, FP8 dispatching and BF16 combining).

Dispatch #EP Latency RDMA bandwidth Combine #EP Latency RDMA bandwidth
8 163 us 46 GB/S. 8 318 us 46 GB/S.
16 173 us 43 GB/s 16 329 us 44 GB/S.
32 182 us 41 GB/s 32 350 us 41 GB/s
64 186 us 40 GB/s 64 353 us 41 GB/s
128 192 us 39 GB/S. 128 369 us 39 GB/S.
256 194 us 39 GB/S. 256 360 us 40 GB/s

Quick start

Requirements

  • Hopper GPUs (may support more architectures or devices later)
  • Python 3.8 and above
  • CUDA 12.3 and above
  • PyTorch 2.1 and above
  • NVLink for intranode communication
  • RDMA network for internode communication

Download and install NVSHMEM dependency

DeepEP also depends on our modified NVSHMEM. Please refer to our NVSHMEM Installation Guide for instructions.

Development

# Build and make symbolic links for SO filesNVSHMEM_DIR=/path/to/installed/nvshmem python setup.py build# You may modify the specific SO names according to your own platformln -s build/lib.linux-x86_64-cpython-38/deep_ep_cpp.cpython-38-x86_64-linux-gnu.so# Run test cases# NOTES: you may modify the `init_dist` function in `tests/utils.py`# according to your own cluster settings, and launch into multiple nodes python tests/test_intranode.pypython tests/test_internode.pypython tests/test_low_latency.py

Installation

NVSHMEM_DIR=/path/to/installed/nvshmem python setup.py install

Then, import deep_ep in your Python project, and enjoy!

Network configurations

DeepEP is fully tested with InfiniBand networks. However, it is theoretically compatible with RDMA over Converged Ethernet (RoCE) as well.

Traffic isolation

Traffic isolation is supported by InfiniBand through Virtual Lanes (VL).

To prevent interference between different types of traffic, we recommend segregating workloads across different virtual lanes as follows:

  • workloads using normal kernels
  • workloads using low-latency kernels
  • other workloads

For DeepEP, you can control the virtual lane assignment by setting the NVSHMEM_IB_SL environment variable.

Adaptive routing

Adaptive routing is an advanced routing feature provided by InfiniBand switches that can evenly distribute traffic across multiple paths. Currently, low-latency kernels support adaptive routing, while normal kernels do not (support may be added soon). Enabling adaptive routing for normal internode kernels may lead to deadlocks or data corruption issues.

For low-latency kernels, enabling adaptive routing can completely eliminate network congestion caused by routing conflicts, but it also introduces additional latency. We recommend the following configuration for optimal performance:

  • enable adaptive routing in environments with heavy network loads
  • use static routing in environments with light network loads

Congestion control

Congestion control is disabled as we have not observed significant congestion in our production environment.

Interfaces and examples

Example use in model training or inference prefilling

The normal kernels can be used in model training or the inference prefilling phase (without the backward part) as the below example code shows.

Moreover, inside the dispatch function, we may not know how many tokens to receive for the current rank. So an implicit CPU wait for GPU received count signal will be involved, as the following figure shows.

Example use in inference decoding

The low latency kernels can be used in the inference decoding phase as the below example code shows.

import torchimport torch.distributed as distfrom typing import Tuple, Optionalfrom deep_ep import Buffer# Communication buffer (will allocate at runtime)# NOTES: there is no SM control API for the low-latency kernels_buffer: Optional[Buffer] = None# You may call this function at the framework initializationdef get_buffer(group: dist.ProcessGroup, num_max_dispatch_tokens_per_rank: int, hidden: int, num_experts: int) -> Buffer:    # NOTES: the low-latency mode will consume much more space than the normal mode    # So we recommend that `num_max_dispatch_tokens_per_rank` (the actual batch size in the decoding engine) should be less than 256    global _buffer    num_rdma_bytes = Buffer.get_low_latency_rdma_size_hint(num_max_dispatch_tokens_per_rank, hidden, group.size(), num_experts)    # Allocate a buffer if not existed or not enough buffer size    if _buffer is None or _buffer.group != group or not _buffer.low_latency_mode or _buffer.num_rdma_bytes  num_rdma_bytes:        # NOTES: for best performance, the QP number **must** be equal to the number of the local experts        assert num_experts % group.size() == 0        _buffer = Buffer(group, 0, num_rdma_bytes, low_latency_mode=True, num_qps_per_rank=num_experts // group.size())    return _bufferdef low_latency_dispatch(hidden_states: torch.Tensor, topk_idx: torch.Tensor, num_max_dispatch_tokens_per_rank: int, num_experts: int):    global _buffer    # Do MoE dispatch, compatible with CUDA graph (but you may restore some buffer status once you replay)    recv_hidden_states, recv_expert_count, handle, event, hook =         _buffer.low_latency_dispatch(hidden_states, topk_idx, num_max_dispatch_tokens_per_rank, num_experts,                                     async_finish=False, return_recv_hook=True)    # NOTES: the actual tensor will not be received only if you call `hook()`,    # it is useful for double-batch overlapping, but **without any SM occupation**    # If you don't want to overlap, please set `return_recv_hook=False`    # Later, you can use our GEMM library to do the computation with this specific format    return recv_hidden_states, recv_expert_count, handle, event, hookdef low_latency_combine(hidden_states: torch.Tensor,                        topk_idx: torch.Tensor, topk_weights: torch.Tensor, handle: Tuple):    global _buffer    # Do MoE combine, compatible with CUDA graph (but you may restore some buffer status once you replay)    combined_hidden_states, event_overlap, hook =         _buffer.low_latency_combine(hidden_states, topk_idx, topk_weights, handle,                                    async_finish=False, return_recv_hook=True)    # NOTES: the same behavior as described in the dispatch kernel    return combined_hidden_states, event_overlap, hook

For two micro-batch overlapping, you can refer to the following figure. With our receiving hook interface, the RDMA network traffics are happening in the background, without costing any GPU SMs from the computation part. But notice, the overlapped parts can be adjusted, i.e. the 4 parts of attention/dispatch/MoE/combine may not have the exact same execution time. You may adjust the stage settings according to your workload.

Notices

  • For extreme performance, we discover and use a behavior-out-of-doc PTX instruction: ld.global.nc.L1::no_allocate.L2::256B. This instruction will lead to an undefined behavior: accessing volatile GPU memory with non-coherent read-only PTX modifiers .nc. But the correctness is tested to be guaranteed with .L1::no_allocate on Hopper architectures, and performance will be much better. If you find kernels not working on some other platforms, you may add DISABLE_AGGRESSIVE_PTX_INSTRS=1 to setup.py and disable this, or file an issue.
  • For better performance on your cluster, we recommend to run all the tests and use the best auto-tuned configuration. The default configurations are optimized on the DeepSeek’s internal cluster.

License

This code repository is released under the MIT License, except for codes that reference NVSHMEM (including csrc/kernels/ibgda_device.cuh and third-party/nvshmem.patch), which are subject to NVSHMEM SLA.

Citation

If you use this codebase, or otherwise found our work valuable, please cite:

@misc{deepep2025,      title={DeepEP: an efficient expert-parallel communication library},      author={Chenggang Zhao and Shangyan Zhou and Liyue Zhang and Chengqi Deng and Zhean Xu and Yuxuan Liu and Kuai Yu and Jiashi Li and Liang Zhao},      year={2025},      publisher={GitHub},      howpublished={url{https://github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepEP}},}

www.aiobserver.co

NO COMMENTS

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Exit mobile version