Subscribe to our daily and weekly emails for the latest updates on AI. Learn More
AI agents are undergoing a revolution and Microsoft’s release of AutoGen V0.4 this week marked an important step forward in this journey. Microsoft’s AutoGen is a robust, extensible, and scalable framework that addresses the challenges of developing multi-agent systems in enterprise applications. What does this release tell you about the current state of agentic AI, and how does it compare with other major frameworks such as LangChain or CrewAI? This article explores AutoGen’s standout features and places it in the context of AI agent frameworks. It helps developers understand what is possible and where the industry will be headed.
The Promise of an “asynchronous event driven architecture”
AutoGen v0.4 adopts an asynchronous event driven architecture (see Microsoft’s Full blog post). This is a significant improvement over older sequential designs that required agents to wait for one process to finish before starting another. For developers, this translates into faster task execution and more efficient resource utilization–especially critical for multi-agent systems.
Consider, for example, a scenario in which multiple agents work together on a complex task. One agent collects data using APIs, while another parses it, and a final agent generates a report. These agents can interact dynamically with a central agent that orchestrates the tasks, using asynchronous processing. This architecture is designed to meet the needs of modern businesses that are looking for scalability, without compromising on performance.
Asynchronous abilities are becoming more and more common. Microsoft’s focus on this design principle shows its commitment to keeping AutoGen as competitive as possible. Langchain and CrewAI are AutoGen’s main competitors.
AutoGen in Microsoft’s Enterprise Ecosystem
Microsoft’s strategy for AutoGen reveals that it has a dual approach. It empowers enterprise developers with a framework like AutoGen while also offering prebuilt agents applications and other enterprise features through Copilot Studio. (See my coverage of Microsoft’s extensive agentic buildout, crowned by the ten prebuilt applications announced in November at Microsoft Ignite). Microsoft’s AutoGen framework has been updated to provide developers with the tools they need to create custom solutions. It also offers low-code options that can be deployed faster.
To be clear, it’s not clear how precisely Microsoft’s prebuilt agent applications leverage this latest AutoGen framework. After all, Microsoft has just finished rehauling AutoGen to make it more flexible and scalable—and Microsoft’s pre-built agents were released in November. But by gradually integrating AutoGen into its offerings going forward, Microsoft clearly aims to balance accessibility for developers with the demands of enterprise-scale deployments.
How AutoGen compares to LangChain
Frameworks like LangChain, and CrewAI have carved out their niches in the world of agentic AI. CrewAI is a relatively new framework that gained popularity for its drag-and-drop interfaces and simplicity. This made it accessible to users with less technical knowledge. As CrewAI has grown in features, it has become more difficult to use. We published a podcast this morning, where we discuss the updates.
Currently, these frameworks do not offer a lot of differentiation in terms of technical capabilities. AutoGen’s tight integration with Azure, and its enterprise-focused approach are now what set it apart. While LangChain has recently introduced “ambient agents” for background task automation (see our story on this, which includes an interview with founder Harrison Chase), AutoGen’s strength lies in its extensibility–allowing developers to build custom tools and extensions tailored to specific use cases.
Enterprises are often influenced by their specific needs when choosing between frameworks. LangChain is a great choice for agile teams and startups because of its developer-centric tools. CrewAI’s intuitive interfaces are appealing to low-code enthusiasts. AutoGen will be the preferred choice for organizations that are already part of Microsoft’s ecosystem. Witteveen makes the point that these frameworks still serve primarily as a place to experiment and build prototypes, and that developers often port their work to their own custom environments (such as Pydantic for Python) for actual deployment. It’s true that as these frameworks develop their extensibility and integrate capabilities, this may change.
Enterprise Ready: The Data and Adoption Challenge
Many enterprises aren’t ready to fully embrace agentic AI despite the excitement surrounding this technology. The organizations I’ve spoken with in the past month include Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic and GSK in healthcare; Chevron in energy; and Wayfair and ABinBev, in retail. They are focusing their efforts on building robust data architectures before deploying AI agents. The promise of agentic AI is not achievable without clean, well-organized, data.
Enterprises face significant challenges in ensuring alignment and safety. Controlled flow engineering, the practice of tightly controlling how agents perform tasks, remains critical. This is especially true for industries like healthcare and finance that have strict compliance requirements.
What’s next in AI agents?
As competition between agentic AI frameworks intensifies, the industry is moving away from a race to create better models and focusing on real-world usability. Features such as asynchronous architectures and tool extensibility are no longer optional, but essential.
AutoGen V0.4 is a significant step by Microsoft, signaling their intent to lead the enterprise AI space. The lesson for developers and companies is clear: frameworks of the future will need to balance technical sophistication and ease of use and scalability and control. Microsoft’s AutoGen’s modularity and CrewAI’s simple design are all different approaches to this challenge. Microsoft has done a great job in this area by demonstrating how to use many of the main design patterns for agents that Sam Witteveen, and I, have discussed in our overview. These patterns are reflection (tool use), planning, multi-agent collaborative work, and judging. Andrew Ng helped document them. Here( Microsoft’s Magentic One illustration below hints at many of these patterns.
For more insights into AI agents and their enterprise impact, watch our full discussion about AutoGen’s update on our YouTube podcast below, where we also cover Langchain’s ambient agent announcement, and OpenAI’s jump into agents with GPT Tasks, and how it remains buggy.
Want to impress your boss? VB Daily can help. We provide you with the inside scoop on what companies do with generative AI. From regulatory shifts to practical implementations, we give you the insights you need to maximize ROI.
Read our privacy policy
Thank you for subscribing. Click here to view more VB Newsletters.
An error occured.